Thursday 14 July 2011

Dr. David Kelly

I have referred to this a couple of times in other posts as quite clearly unsatisfactory and unfinished business, as it really does bug me, so I thought I would explain my concerns (or some of them).

David Kelly had made plans, not least regarding his daughters wedding, but suddenly decided to kill himself. Why? The police operation to find him 'started' before he had even left for his walk, let alone had been reported missing. The house was searched by officers who insisted his wife stayed outside. The time of death was inaccurate because the pathologist left it many hours before taking a temperature reading. Very odd. Why were the police not pushing for an 'estimated time of death'? Why the insistence that only two police officers were the first to turn up, when the civilians present reported three? Why no inquest, which is highly unusual? Why did Hutton ignore glaring inconsistencies? Why has the evidence and opinion been ignored of the two paramedics attending that there was too little blood for a death by suicide, caused by slashing the wrist? Why are eminent doctors, including those with relevant expertise, being ignored when they say that it cannot have been suicide? If David Kelly was murdered, as the evidence seems to suggest, who stood to gain from his silence?

Who is being protected? (And it certainly isn't the Iraqi's as Norman Baker bizarrely speculates in his otherwise excellent book).

No comments:

Post a Comment