BBC Self View

We have had a couple of wonderful examples of the view the BBC has of the world and itself. Firstly the coverage of the Jubilee celebrations and the BBC's reaction to criticism. If that many people turned out in the cold and wet to see a river pageant honouring Her Majesty then it is clear their is a great and deep seated respect for the monarchy in the UK.

The BBC knows better of course and had already decided that whilst it had to cover the event, nobody would be really interested and would much prefer trivial witterings by its 'hip' presenters. Those chosen to fill the roles had neither any idea about the subject they would be presenting on, or indeed bothered to do any research. It obviously hadn't registered as being of any importance nor would be watched by very many people.

Such is the prevailing attitude within the BBC. They 'know' without asking. and anyway, they are right about everything so you must have the broadcasting they deem correct to help educate you as to the correct mindset.

Ferne Cotton has protested that criticism of her amounts to bullying. Firstly, if she is such a delicate flower then perhaps a role in the public eye is an incorrect career choice and secondly it is only bullying if it is inaccurate. If she felt her contribution was pivotal, intelligent and helpful, then she should say so and explain why. To everyone else it was ditzy, no offence.

The BBC naturally is stunned. It was and remains unaware that the UK has more than a smattering of 'Royalists' or in fact people who believe Britain to be important (in the context of its more important place as an unimportant part of the EU). Consequently in cannot see that just because not one of its presenters had the faintest idea what they were doing or why (including some for whom great respect is given, when in their field of expertise), that this should be subject to derision.

I loved the comment from the delicious Victoria Coren on 'Have I got a little more news for you' last night, that the BBC produces programme for their viewer who is some 'imaginary idiot'.

Another example was how they presented a news item about the Education Secretary trying to reintroduce tried and proven techniques to educate children. The ideas of course fell out of use as trendy 'BBC types' took over education, so naturally the BBC themselves needed to provide balance, which usually means, their point of view.

Times tables are to be learned, spelling tests introduced and poetry recital. These things provide basic tools to allow children to do much else. The incredulous BBC said that this could mean a return to learning by rote, which 'doesn't teach children anything'. Of course this bizarre interpretation needed no attempt at substantiation. Learning by rote = wrong. Full stop.

Here is the difference between the real world and the BBC. Take any person and get them to examine a child's level of education. They will find the child will usually be poor at spelling, arithmetic and general knowledge. They will be aware that climate change is the biggest threat facing mankind and that 'renewable' energy will save us. They won't know why.

The BBC will say almost all children have a high level of education, because the exam results say so. But won't go near a child to find out.