I see the Jimmy Savile business is bringing the Left and its undying support for paedophilia into the open. The Guardian have a nice, supportive piece about how children are not harmed by sex, if they volunteer. Strange, I thought children were not mature enough to make decisions like that. Perhaps, if they are, then there is a group agitating for recognition, children who, being mature enough to consider these things want their voices heard.
But no, there are only adult paedophiles and Left ideologues spouting this dangerous nonsense. Perhaps Harriet Harman could give us her views. She, on behalf of the opposition, deplored the activities of Jimmy Savile, but once defended the position that paedophilia was OK. How does she manage to hold these differing views? Maybe she has changed her mind. Or maybe Savile supporting Thatcher was his real crime, in her eyes.
Now we are used to hearing all manner of things about the Tories and why they are 'nasty' and some of these things are true. But somehow real stories of dangerous left wing activity and ideas don't seem to go anywhere. That's because most of the media is in thrall to left ideology and the Tory supporters rarely go in for witch hunts and fabricating stories. Perhaps the public should awake from their torpor and take more responsibility for what happens in a democracy. While we still have one.
Showing posts with label left wing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label left wing. Show all posts
Thursday, 3 January 2013
Monday, 19 November 2012
What's Left?
We have had decades of the Left attempting to undermine Western Civilisation; to destroy the traditional family, to impoverish our education system of its rigour, to cripple individual thought and to demonise capitalism.
But all of a sudden, the blows are coming one after another. The energy scam, that costs all of us a fortune through increased taxes and increased fuel costs, is now being seen for what it is. Political corruption, institutionalised under Blair is in the limelight, the BBC and all Left wing media is constantly being caught out for its arrogance, its lies and its bias.
The EU is falling apart just as they thought they were at the tipping point to truly gaining an irreversible Soviet republic, without any hint of democracy. And it is as frightening as it can get. France has hidden for a very long time that it is broke. Now one of the big contributors to the EU, the UK, is asking for cut backs and may even leave the EU. For France this would be a disaster. They rely for their survival on vast sums of EU funds diverted to them, as they designed from the outset they should, and cannot exist without them.
Greece may be economically corrupt and incapable of balancing a budget, but France has long been morally bankrupt, following Left influences, which to be fair have worked a treat for quite some time. But in times of stress weaknesses become apparent and today we have the double stress of a corrupt banking system falling apart (and who encouraged that?) and the corrupt system of the Euro.
At every turn you find the light shining on the Left, caught out like rats in a dark room. The attempt to exert their control over the Press has been exposed too, as the Leveson inquiry has been found to be almost exclusively advised by Left wing activists, intent on gagging a free press.
In many ways we are at a similar moment that the other great Left wing schemer, Hitler, found himself in when confronting Weimar. He was able to con a nation to his will, the Left since have had to work covertly over a longer period of time. But whilst he was able to keep hidden what a monster he was and what disasters he would bring on everyone, the Left today are exposed. We should break its back now, decisively and completely.
Have we ever acted so boldly outside war? There certainly is much talk of a need for a strong character, a Churchill, but all we have is Cameron and Miliband. Pipsqueaks when compared to mediocrity, let alone greatness.
But all of a sudden, the blows are coming one after another. The energy scam, that costs all of us a fortune through increased taxes and increased fuel costs, is now being seen for what it is. Political corruption, institutionalised under Blair is in the limelight, the BBC and all Left wing media is constantly being caught out for its arrogance, its lies and its bias.
The EU is falling apart just as they thought they were at the tipping point to truly gaining an irreversible Soviet republic, without any hint of democracy. And it is as frightening as it can get. France has hidden for a very long time that it is broke. Now one of the big contributors to the EU, the UK, is asking for cut backs and may even leave the EU. For France this would be a disaster. They rely for their survival on vast sums of EU funds diverted to them, as they designed from the outset they should, and cannot exist without them.
Greece may be economically corrupt and incapable of balancing a budget, but France has long been morally bankrupt, following Left influences, which to be fair have worked a treat for quite some time. But in times of stress weaknesses become apparent and today we have the double stress of a corrupt banking system falling apart (and who encouraged that?) and the corrupt system of the Euro.
At every turn you find the light shining on the Left, caught out like rats in a dark room. The attempt to exert their control over the Press has been exposed too, as the Leveson inquiry has been found to be almost exclusively advised by Left wing activists, intent on gagging a free press.
In many ways we are at a similar moment that the other great Left wing schemer, Hitler, found himself in when confronting Weimar. He was able to con a nation to his will, the Left since have had to work covertly over a longer period of time. But whilst he was able to keep hidden what a monster he was and what disasters he would bring on everyone, the Left today are exposed. We should break its back now, decisively and completely.
Have we ever acted so boldly outside war? There certainly is much talk of a need for a strong character, a Churchill, but all we have is Cameron and Miliband. Pipsqueaks when compared to mediocrity, let alone greatness.
Tuesday, 6 September 2011
Penal Reform
Ken 'Muddled' Clarke comments that the recent riots were due to the inadequacies of the penal system; that prison hasn't stopped re-offending. It seems you see, that fully 75% of those arrested for riot related crimes already had a criminal record. Once again the bleat is that the state, the justice system, the prison service, do not do enough for these poor lost souls.
Being of a left leaning persuasion Clarke is bound to come to these conclusions. For the Left a dependent class supports their reason for existing, it gives them something to pontificate about and people to order around. That their ideas are proved wrong time and time again is no reason to abandon them; according to the logic of the Left it means more intervention is needed, that anyone opposing (i.e. proving them wrong) should be silenced.
Prison, the wets believe, should rehabilitate the offender, ready to go into society a changed person, ready to take a proper, law abiding place in the ranks. The other extreme says that locking them up on bread and water would teach them a lesson, be a proper punishment and make them not want to go back. Either way, what we are talking about is changing their mindset. And that is the key.
It is a key that is perpetually missed though, by the Left because they don't care, their interest in criminals is self-serving, by the others because they don't give them a second thought. Until they are back again. You see, you can only change someone if they want to. Much as the Left are totally wrong about poverty leading to crime, which is demonstrably untrue, so they are wrong about their attitude to crime. The criminal makes the choice to be a criminal. He makes the choice to go back to crime.
His reasoning will be varied and individual but will conform to a broad stereotype. He will not want to work and take the instruction of others this will doubtless entail. He wants material things but lacks the means due to his decision not to work. Just as his immaturity will not allow him to take instruction, so he will not have any empathy with those he steals from, mugs or kills. He will instead be filled with his own self worth and a baseless opinion of superiority.Thus dangerously equipped he goes out into the world.
This is the mindset we have to target. A mindset of selfish arrogance. Sure we have to show him that making different choices make sense. But that means we also have to improve our educational standards, removing the Left's insistence on keeping the 'workers' down, to maintain their constituency. We have to have proper education, that teaches and expects respect based on ability, not 'respec' based on the threat of violence.
We would also need a proper prison regime, that is an unpleasant though not brutal experience one best not repeated, as it presents them with that choice. Currently it makes absolute sense for them to commit crimes as the chance of getting caught is slight, the sentence if caught will be light and prison a place of constant apology for the inconvenience to their lifestyle. An impact that is minimised by expensive equipment to keep them entertained and a fairly relaxed attitude to drug taking (no matter how loud governors and Ministers squeal the opposite to be true).
It starts in the classroom where the teacher who fails to maintain discipline either through lack of personality or institutional diktat, will be mercilessly dealt with by the pupils in his charge. And so this display of weakness will be used to gain advantage at every turn. As indeed it is in the current criminal justice set up we have and into which Clarke wishes to introduce further weakness. As I have said before, you can call it toughness or tough love, but we have to take away the options from these feral youths.
It is why people kick out and say take away their benefits, because that will frighten them. It will show their actions have consequences and will affect their choices. We have to crack this quickly though, otherwise we will have to take this route and it will inevitably mean a return of something very like the workhouse. If evicting someone makes them homeless, what does that achieve? But if you cannot use the sanction how do you succeed? It would mean a further step down to a barracks style accommodation that is locked at night, with food provided, if you are back by the time the compound gates are closed.
Everywhere you look the infection of the dangerous and damaging Left ideology is seen, causing all manner of problems. In schools, in the managerial style adopted by the NHS that is now able to kill people at an accelerated rate. In hopeless policing and hapless government. In the constant revelations of incompetence in IT systems and MoD procurement. All of these debasements of our abilities and our society's worth have been brought about by Left ideology creeping up on us through the institutions.
An idiot senior police officer, addressing a government committee looking into the riots said that the only reason they were as extensive as they were was not due to strategy (his responsibility) but to a lack of officers (a veiled reference to 'cuts' -that haven't happened yet). He was pleased he said, that no-one was in hospital, seriously hurt because they went in short-handed. Forgetting of course that his officers had recently shot and killed a man posing no threat to them. Again. In fact, it was entirely due to strategy and the glaring lack of it. The officers were available, but he hadn't mobilised them, didn't use those he had effectively, didn't have a plan and felt entirely at ease 'standing back'. The ideology of the Left.
We know this because if there is any hint of right wing affiliation then they turn up in strength and go in hard, even when not necessary. Hence the tolerance of Muslim violence (in accordance with Multiculturalism) but attacks against those who oppose them (who must be right wing by default). But most shocking of all, was the politically motivated attack on a peaceful march in support of the rights of countryside folk. This was an outburst of Left agitation against its enemies, hidden under the acceptable (to them) code of class hatred. In fact of course it doesn't refer to class, it is the same as Nazism in Germany of the Thirties, using violence to deal with political opposition.
Being of a left leaning persuasion Clarke is bound to come to these conclusions. For the Left a dependent class supports their reason for existing, it gives them something to pontificate about and people to order around. That their ideas are proved wrong time and time again is no reason to abandon them; according to the logic of the Left it means more intervention is needed, that anyone opposing (i.e. proving them wrong) should be silenced.
Prison, the wets believe, should rehabilitate the offender, ready to go into society a changed person, ready to take a proper, law abiding place in the ranks. The other extreme says that locking them up on bread and water would teach them a lesson, be a proper punishment and make them not want to go back. Either way, what we are talking about is changing their mindset. And that is the key.
It is a key that is perpetually missed though, by the Left because they don't care, their interest in criminals is self-serving, by the others because they don't give them a second thought. Until they are back again. You see, you can only change someone if they want to. Much as the Left are totally wrong about poverty leading to crime, which is demonstrably untrue, so they are wrong about their attitude to crime. The criminal makes the choice to be a criminal. He makes the choice to go back to crime.
His reasoning will be varied and individual but will conform to a broad stereotype. He will not want to work and take the instruction of others this will doubtless entail. He wants material things but lacks the means due to his decision not to work. Just as his immaturity will not allow him to take instruction, so he will not have any empathy with those he steals from, mugs or kills. He will instead be filled with his own self worth and a baseless opinion of superiority.Thus dangerously equipped he goes out into the world.
This is the mindset we have to target. A mindset of selfish arrogance. Sure we have to show him that making different choices make sense. But that means we also have to improve our educational standards, removing the Left's insistence on keeping the 'workers' down, to maintain their constituency. We have to have proper education, that teaches and expects respect based on ability, not 'respec' based on the threat of violence.
We would also need a proper prison regime, that is an unpleasant though not brutal experience one best not repeated, as it presents them with that choice. Currently it makes absolute sense for them to commit crimes as the chance of getting caught is slight, the sentence if caught will be light and prison a place of constant apology for the inconvenience to their lifestyle. An impact that is minimised by expensive equipment to keep them entertained and a fairly relaxed attitude to drug taking (no matter how loud governors and Ministers squeal the opposite to be true).
It starts in the classroom where the teacher who fails to maintain discipline either through lack of personality or institutional diktat, will be mercilessly dealt with by the pupils in his charge. And so this display of weakness will be used to gain advantage at every turn. As indeed it is in the current criminal justice set up we have and into which Clarke wishes to introduce further weakness. As I have said before, you can call it toughness or tough love, but we have to take away the options from these feral youths.
It is why people kick out and say take away their benefits, because that will frighten them. It will show their actions have consequences and will affect their choices. We have to crack this quickly though, otherwise we will have to take this route and it will inevitably mean a return of something very like the workhouse. If evicting someone makes them homeless, what does that achieve? But if you cannot use the sanction how do you succeed? It would mean a further step down to a barracks style accommodation that is locked at night, with food provided, if you are back by the time the compound gates are closed.
Everywhere you look the infection of the dangerous and damaging Left ideology is seen, causing all manner of problems. In schools, in the managerial style adopted by the NHS that is now able to kill people at an accelerated rate. In hopeless policing and hapless government. In the constant revelations of incompetence in IT systems and MoD procurement. All of these debasements of our abilities and our society's worth have been brought about by Left ideology creeping up on us through the institutions.
An idiot senior police officer, addressing a government committee looking into the riots said that the only reason they were as extensive as they were was not due to strategy (his responsibility) but to a lack of officers (a veiled reference to 'cuts' -that haven't happened yet). He was pleased he said, that no-one was in hospital, seriously hurt because they went in short-handed. Forgetting of course that his officers had recently shot and killed a man posing no threat to them. Again. In fact, it was entirely due to strategy and the glaring lack of it. The officers were available, but he hadn't mobilised them, didn't use those he had effectively, didn't have a plan and felt entirely at ease 'standing back'. The ideology of the Left.
We know this because if there is any hint of right wing affiliation then they turn up in strength and go in hard, even when not necessary. Hence the tolerance of Muslim violence (in accordance with Multiculturalism) but attacks against those who oppose them (who must be right wing by default). But most shocking of all, was the politically motivated attack on a peaceful march in support of the rights of countryside folk. This was an outburst of Left agitation against its enemies, hidden under the acceptable (to them) code of class hatred. In fact of course it doesn't refer to class, it is the same as Nazism in Germany of the Thirties, using violence to deal with political opposition.
Wednesday, 10 August 2011
Immorality
With the level of organisation being seen in some aspects of these 'riots' it would seem that the lefts' 'useful idiots' have been given a different motivation. In every left inspired campaign, the 'revolutionaries' always lie to get support whether in Vietnam of Tottenham. Here however, a direct appeal to the underclass desire for branded consumer goods has brought them onto the streets to cause the mayhem their masters seek.
The proposed 'cuts' should be thought through again. A reasonable society would cut back on police spending along with everything else, but we have had 13 years of New Labour unpicking the fabric of a decent society and so cannot call ourselves a reasonable society at present. So no, the Armed Forces need strengthening and the police need their budgets at least maintained (but get rid of Blairism in the force and introduce efficiency).
Savings really can be made (and a lot of people have put themselves forward by looting) by reducing and deleting the benefits of those who do not and will not contribute to their community, let alone those who destroy it. Cameron should protect and enhance those organs of state that we need and serve us well and get rid of the rest. No more pussy footing around with Westminster bubble politics, face the real world. Get out of the EU. Stop building pointless wind farms and stop believing in the 'carbon reduction' tripe the same people who organised the rioting came up with.
I mean that. Whilst Richard Curtis may feel comfortable with murdering people who oppose his point of view, I am sure many people who haven't thought too much about Global Warming, do believe what they have been fed. But a lot of the real pushers are motivated by anything but the pains of the planet. They have used it to push an agenda of hate, designed to undermine Western capitalism and democracy. And they use the simple-minded as well as the easily led politician, hence we get looting and CO2 taxes.
The proposed 'cuts' should be thought through again. A reasonable society would cut back on police spending along with everything else, but we have had 13 years of New Labour unpicking the fabric of a decent society and so cannot call ourselves a reasonable society at present. So no, the Armed Forces need strengthening and the police need their budgets at least maintained (but get rid of Blairism in the force and introduce efficiency).
Savings really can be made (and a lot of people have put themselves forward by looting) by reducing and deleting the benefits of those who do not and will not contribute to their community, let alone those who destroy it. Cameron should protect and enhance those organs of state that we need and serve us well and get rid of the rest. No more pussy footing around with Westminster bubble politics, face the real world. Get out of the EU. Stop building pointless wind farms and stop believing in the 'carbon reduction' tripe the same people who organised the rioting came up with.
I mean that. Whilst Richard Curtis may feel comfortable with murdering people who oppose his point of view, I am sure many people who haven't thought too much about Global Warming, do believe what they have been fed. But a lot of the real pushers are motivated by anything but the pains of the planet. They have used it to push an agenda of hate, designed to undermine Western capitalism and democracy. And they use the simple-minded as well as the easily led politician, hence we get looting and CO2 taxes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)