Disgraceful; A Laughing Stock

Well, many parliaments around the world are based on the British model, but it showed just how bad it can be when stocked almost exclusively by self-impressed morons. Last night was a disgrace and will have made Britain and British politics the laughing stock of the world. Trump hasn't even come close to the haughty, hubristic tantrums on display here.

Here is the background. In the early Seventies, a Conservative(!) Prime Minister, Edward Heath, lied to the electorate about joining something called the Common Market. He told us it was a trading bloc and would make Britain a stronger country (we were, as all EU members are when joining, broke).

He knew though, as recently released government documents show, that the (then) EEC was a political project to unite all the individual countries of Europe into a single superstate, with a central government, and all the attendant structures such as tax, policing, military, laws, currency etc.

The EU has had as its abiding principle since its inception between the World Wars, that it should operate in secret and not reveal its objectives. Have you ever heard a debate about 'Europe'? Has its way of working ever been explained to you, at school, university, on TV? No. And that is very important to its success.

The EU is run by unelected bureaucrats, often referred to as technocrats, and has a pretend parliament to confuse the people of the various countries as to its operation. The MEPs can and do vote on laws proposed by the bureaucrats and can put forward amendments, but they will get the same law come back endlessly until they approve it. You can only imagine that when the single government is finally achieved this little farce will be deleted.

There is no common culture across Europe, no common language. We have different traditions and laws. Only the French and German traditions of attempting to subjugate Europe are permitted going forward though, with for instance, the (German) currency crushing the economies of the Southern European countries. There is no demos, but some politicians want an empire, so Europe will be balkanised.

Can you think of any example of a country, taking over several other countries and running them from a central government, which controls everything through laws and regulations? Yes, the USSR. How did that go?

Something even as fundamental as the law divides us. In Britain, a traditionally strong, inventive and industrious nation, we evolved laws that constrained absolute monarchs and placed the law in the hands of the people. We vote for people to represent us in parliament and if they don't do what we want, they are chucked out at the next election.

In the EU, where the law is dominated by the French, the State owns the law and the people do what they are told. A short summary of this would be, in Britain everything is legal unless we decide to make it illegal, in the EU everything is illegal unless the State allows it.

This comes from the militaristic, empire building tradition of not just France, but Germany also. The French see themselves as the finest administrators in the world and so should run the EU, but need German money so tolerate them as a 'partner'. Germany think they should run it, because they pay for it and tolerate French input because there would be another war if they didn't.

So, with some inkling that the EU was too different, too bureaucratic and not functioning very well and with a suspicion as to what they were up, what came next, the British voted to leave the EU. The largest turnout ever saw 17.4 million people issue this instruction.

Parliament had pledged almost unanimously to action the result. Both Labour and Conservative candidates ran on a manifesto to honour that pledge. Parliament voted overwhelmingly to trigger Article 50, the mechanism by which a member informs the EU that they are leaving.

However, ignoring 17.4 million people, their own election manifesto pledges and in many cases actually defying the majority of their constituents, MP's decided that no one tells them what to do. Most MP's are 'Remainers' and want to stay in the bureaucrats paradise, the EUSSR. So they started wrecking the process.

The analogy that the Remain MP's are acting like children having a tantrum at not getting their way, is in fact so accurate it is beyond parody. Using a typical Marxist trick (all of them, even the 'Conservatives') the Remainers try to create a false narrative. They say that the Leavers have lied incessantly, blocked progress and want a 'hard Brexit'. That the referendum only voted Leave because of the campaign of lies by vote Leave.

Let's examine that. Leave MP's have consistently insisted and voted to support the will of the people, being the proper role of parliament, and have only blocked attempts to thwart that, which cannot be characterised as 'blocking progress'. The Leave campaign was not massively funded, but may have made some technical mistakes in using the funds, on occasion, that didn't amount to a hill of beans.

Remain however, had enormous resources; the UK government pumped money into it, as did foreign individuals of high net wealth and of course, the EU. Massive collusion and misuse of funds took place, which the Electoral Commission have no problem with, because they choose only to investigate Leave.

As to lies, currently Britain should be in a recession, at least 600,000 people should have lost their jobs in 2016 and the pound should be on the floor. This is what Remain promised would happen if we dared to vote to leave. In fact, there are at least 700,000 more in work, the economy is growing (faster than the EU) and the world is knocking on our door looking for trade deals.

The media is almost all on the side of Remain, so there is no proper analysis (phew, says the EU) and the BBC fanatically so.

Consequently the world is treated to the spectacle of a bunch of immature, entitled bigots acting as if they alone possess the knowledge and wherewithal to understand the blindingly simple concept of leave means leave. (Ask if they would like some money, they know the answer to that!).

Here is another question for you; Remain also tell us that we trade so much with the EU that we will be destroyed if we leave (they never go any further by way of explanation, you will notice). This presupposes that the EU will not buy anything from us after we leave. But how about this; the EU is possibly the most over-regulated, risk-averse structures in the world. How much stronger and bigger would the UK economy be now, if we had never joined, never been held back by the EU?

And to the final point. Remainers, like all children assert ridiculous things to confirm their position. May lost a vote yesterday (by 4 votes) and so now she is 'morally' obliged to take No Deal off the table. No mention of how the moral authority of 17.4 million people stacks up with those 4 MP's (or even the maybe 500 Loser, sorry Remainer MPs).

But here is the thing. There are common laws and there are Constitutional laws. When Tony Blair decided in his supreme arrogance to abolish the position of Lord Chancellor he was informed that it was a Constitutional position and not within his gift to have any say on. (And there was Tony thinking he was either an absolute ruler of perhaps a god).

This throws up a slight flaw in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland joining the European Union (and they do call it joining, even though they mean the UK to be subsumed) By handing the power to make laws in the UK and indeed to change the very nature of our law-making, the government was handing authority to a foreign power - a Constitutional act and something that is not within their power.

Edward Heath wasn't just lying to make you think wrongly of the EU, he had to hide that we were signing away sovereignty, because to admit that would be to admit its illegality.

Technically, we have never been in the EU because it was impossible to 'join' such an organisation. (And the EU is an organisation just like the UN, or NATO or any other international body -except they don't get to run our country!)

The EU 2013

Apparently Jose Manuel Barroso had a word with Santa and all the EU's troubles are over. Oh and they were never caused by EU policies. Yeah, right.

Still, new ideas about our relationship are absent, just the old 'we should stay in' with the renegotiate caveat added. Renegotiate? The EU allows no such thing, so now what? Well, undaunted, the true believers are suggesting that Britain has a moral duty to help make the EU a better place. Oh please.

The only way any British input would make the EU a better place would be if the EU adopted the nature of British democracy for all its peoples. If Common Law and Habeas Corpus were implemented throughout. But that would fly in the face of the founding principles of the EU. It is designed to be anti-democratic, the people should have no say whatsoever.

Far reaching police powers are needed (the EU arrest warrant being a key part) so that citizens anywhere can be dealt with from the centre. That those people must realise that the state exists and must be served by the people (in the UK, the people used to own the law).

Question Time last night found time to try to ridicule a Tory, Nadine Dorries for taking part in a TV show (of no merit) but had no time to discuss the fabric of law and the protection it offers being removed to suit EU politics.

And as for Obama's administration saying we should stay in, that is like asking a thief if they could hold your wallet. I know it is not politic these days to point out failings of real substance, but when the last leftie in the US forced mortgages on people who couldn't afford them and seeded the subsequent banking crisis, I'm not sure they have a moral ant-hill to stand on, let alone any high ground.

Is the EU a good idea? If you think so, ask yourself a question. When was the last time a totalitarian government was a good thing? When you think how feeble Britain was in the face of the German war machine of 1940, yet Churchill knew we had to stand up to a tyrannical regime no matter what, how did Edward 'Quisling' Heath answer the demand to surrender sovereignty with a cheerful, 'yes, most certainly. Peace in our time'?

This tripe that the EU was designed to and indeed has prevented European war is laughable. The fact there has been no war in the EU countries has many causes, none of which wander anywhere near EU politics. And the EU's complete and utter failure to assist in the wars following the break-up of Yugoslavia proves that a) Europe is in no way united and b) the EU is an incompetent construct capable only of creating and hiding large scale corruption. Which was of course, its real intention from the outset. (And why Tony Blair so keenly wishes to 'lead' it).

Great Britain

When attempting to close down debate on immigration, the Left often appeal to our national sense of fair play, our reasonable nature. And being reasonable and recognising the truth of what they say, we give in. But mass immigration undermines British culture, including the bit about 'fair play'. It is precisely because it does, that the Left encourage it.

It is true though that Britain has always stood apart from the rest of Europe in a very special way. We have, as a nation, remained calm whilst all around are losing their heads. We may well have relied on the US to save us from Germany in the last world war, but we were still resolute ourselves and didn't blame anyone else for our predicament, as did the French. For France, a nation that pretty much didn't bother during WW2, beyond a certain stiff resistance to Britain in support of their new German friends, it was Britain that grievously let them down, by not saving them.

This stoicism of spirit that exists in Britain is based on a history of people power that goes back centuries. Really, some amazing things were done in what we might otherwise think less enlightened times. The separation of powers between sovereign and the executive, the right to trial, the law being the instrument of the people; all of these things made us what we are.

Until recent times, when tyrants returned, we owned the law and governments feared us. Now all is reversed and Europe has taken its revenge on us for not being as stupid as them.

It is an important point that in the Britain we used to have, everything was legal unless we agreed to make it illegal. A policeman was a citizen in uniform and could only operate with the consent of the people. The absence of crime was an indicator of an effective police force. Their power was held in check by having limited access to weapons and by being split into many forces, all without a direct political control.

Many offences were minor and treated as such, with only more serious matters being considered criminal. A British subject of the Crown was free to a very great extent. Our predecessors paid moderate taxes to the State, but only assisted the State when they wanted to. We carried nor identification, nor were required to do so.

Today of course, nearly everything is a 'criminal' offence because the State, in the form of the supreme government of Britain in Brussels, says that everything is illegal unless they permit it. The police exist to protect the State and as such will be well armed. Whilst repeated attempts to con us into accepting identity cards (to protect us from terrorism even!) have failed, the (expensive) enforcement of regularly expiring passports as 'proof of identity' is now commonplace.

The reason Britain was a great country, with admired traditions and national character, was due to these hard won freedoms, that permeated our society. That we have allowed them to be destroyed and taken away by venal, uncomprehending politicians and petty tyrants, is to our great shame.