In The News Today

Back in the news is the inability of white people to adopt black children. This is caused by good, old fashioned racism by the leftie social workers. And this is the real deal, not the pretend racism that is thrown around all the time. This is an ideological stance that black people are different and must not be affected by white people. Not bad for stereotyping. I'm not sure the black child of British born black people is too concerned with their African heritage, but the social workers are. Sure, as they grow up they might have a 'genes reunited' moment, but that doesn't mean they reject their British heritage and go to live in the Congo.

The racism here is based on the belief of white left liberals who know, in their very soul, that non-white people are inferior and need the special care and attention that white, left liberals have in their hearts. Why else all the race equality paraphernalia? Why the insistence on setting up black organisations, for groups such as black police officers? Why would it be racist if there were a white police officers organisation? Black people, they feel, need special help. Why else does the left treat 'ethnics' as if they were children?

It has been a very effective weapon in maintaining white hegemony in socialist circles and in maintaining a tension between people of differing colour skins. Left to their own devices people, like water find their own level. Indian people may keep some traditions for instance and maybe dress in an Indian style, but they will  buy a coat, because it's bloody cold. Integration occurs, not sublimation, but integration. And we all get along, unless the leftie pops up to stir up difference again -it is in their genes I think, having done it for so long on class lines.

It strikes me that most of all, social workers must hate mixed-race marriages (as they are called; they are just people with different colour skin usually).

I find it ironic that on the day Cameron is signing us up to some other European initiative he has been too busy to mention, this time the protection of women against violence, he is also lamenting the deaths of six servicemen in Afghanistan. Ironic, because the regime he is supporting with our soldiers lives has a very different, entrenched view of the value of women.

You could take the view that the Afghans as a nation are backward and pretty despicable and in a real sense you would be right, countries and their borders create political entities. But it isn't actually the 'race' Afghan you dislike, it is the culture, or its absence. I think that it is patently obvious, not ideologically obvious or religiously obvious, that women are pretty much like men. Each tends to have something they do better than the other, but overall you could expect the same capability, intellectually out of both.

That is a human view. But it is not one that some countries can accept and there is no way of getting away from it, it is mainly Muslim countries that have this problem. People talk of 'advancement' but they really mean being more like us. I don't mind if a country doesn't, cannot build a Sistine Chapel. I care that, having learnt to talk they cannot develop a simple concept like fairness. Woman stays at home all day, looking after the children she has borne; man sits at a desk and earns money. In what way is one superior to the other? It is a division of labour to achieve a practical outcome.

Actually, Islam is a Socialist religion I think. Both revolve around a power bloc of almighty elites and both seek to rule by sowing discord to ensure there is no popular focus on their arrogance.

(Thinking about it, I do find it academically interesting why some countries cannot build a Sistine Chapel. Why, in all the world does the central part of Africa have no history of great buildings? We know of them in South America, we know of them in South East Asia. Europe of course has an immense tradition in this respect. By far the greatest achievements of ancient Man are in Egypt, but why did this ability not exist a little further South? I'm not trying to make what a Socialist would call a racist point here, I am just genuinely mystified.

How is it that a Briton builds a massive castle, or church, a Mexican builds a step pyramid and an equatorial African decides to give it a miss? I cannot believe there is an anti-Bob-the-Builder gene in that continent. If we all came 'out of Africa', what has happened? I don't think you could get the answer on a postcard).